<ul id="q6cau"><sup id="q6cau"></sup></ul>
<ul id="q6cau"></ul>
<abbr id="q6cau"></abbr>
<strike id="q6cau"><menu id="q6cau"></menu></strike>
  • <ul id="q6cau"></ul>
  • The Annual Explosion Proof Electric Technology & Equipment Event
    logo

    The 25thChina International Explosion Protection and Electric Technology & Equipment Exhibition

    ufi

    BEIJING,CHINA

    March 26-28,2025

    LOCATION :Home> News > Industry News

    Nigeria demands $62 billion from oil majors for past profits

    Pubdate:2019-10-11 15:39 Source:liyanping Click:

    ABUJA (Bloomberg) - Nigeria is seeking to recover as much as $62 billion from international oil companies, using a 2018 Supreme Court ruling the state says enables it to increase its share of income from production-sharing contracts.

    The proposal comes as President Muhammadu Buhari tries to bolster revenue after a drop in the output and price of oil, Nigeria’s main export. It’s previously targeted foreign companies, fining mobile operator MTN Group Ltd. almost $1 billion for failing to disconnect undocumented SIM-card users, and suing firms including JPMorgan Chase & Co. in a corruption scandal.

    In the latest plan, the government says energy companies failed to comply with a 1993 contract-law requirement that the state receive a greater share of revenue when the oil price exceeds $20 per barrel, according to a document prepared by the attorney-general’s office and the Justice Ministry. The document, seen by Bloomberg, was verified by the ministry.

    While the government hasn’t said how it will recover the money, it has said it wants to negotiate with the companies. In its battle with MTN, the fine imposed on the company was negotiated down from an initial penalty of $5.2 billion.

    Nigerian presidency spokesman Garba Shehu didn’t answer three phone calls or respond to a text message requesting comment.

    Under the production-sharing contract law, companies including Royal Dutch Shell Plc, ExxonMobil Corp., Chevron Corp., Total SA and Eni SpA agreed to fund the exploration and production of deep-offshore oil fields on the basis that they would share profit with the government after recovering their costs.

    When the law came into effect 26 years ago, crude was selling for $9.50 per barrel. The oil companies currently take 80% of the profit from these deep-offshore fields, while the government receives 20%, according to the document. Oil traded at $58.29 a barrel on the London-based ICE Futures Europe Exchange.

    Most of Nigeria’s crude is pumped by the five oil companies, which operate joint ventures and partnerships with the state-owned Nigerian National Petroleum Corp.

    Representatives of the oil companies met Justice Minister Abubakar Malami Oct. 3 in the capital, Abuja, according to two people familiar with the discussions who asked not to be identified because the meeting wasn’t public. Malami told them that while no hostility is intended toward investors, the government will ensure all the country’s laws are respected, the people said.

    Ruling Challenged

    Oil companies including Shell have gone to the Federal High Court to challenge the government’s claim that they owe the state any money, arguing that the Supreme Court ruling doesn’t allow the government to collect arrears. They also contend that because the companies weren’t party to the 2018 case, they shouldn’t be subject to the ruling.

    “We do not agree with the legal basis for the claim that we owe outstanding revenues,” Shell’s Nigerian unit said in an emailed response to questions.

    Chevron spokesman Ray Fohr said the company doesn’t comment on matters before the court. Its units in Nigeria “comply with all applicable laws and regulations,” he said by email.

    Exxon and Total declined to comment, while Eni officials didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

    The Supreme Court ruling followed a lawsuit by states in Nigeria’s oil-producing region seeking interpretation of the nation’s production-sharing law. The states argued that they weren’t receiving their full due. The court ruled in their favor and asked the attorney general and justice minister to take steps to recover the outstanding revenue.

    The 1993 law required that its provisions be reviewed after 15 years and subsequently every five years. The attorney-general’s office insists that the provision for a higher share of revenue doesn’t require legislative action to take effect, according to the document.

    “Instead it imposes a duty on the oil companies and contracting parties, being NNPC, to by themselves review the sharing formula,” the ministry said.

    国产日韩精品视频一区二区三区 | 人妻精品久久无码区| 精品久久久久中文字幕日本| 91久久精品91久久性色| 日韩精品无码区免费专区| 亚洲日韩精品A∨片无码加勒比| 99re6在线视频精品免费下载 | 97精品国产91久久久久久| 国产精品亚洲精品日韩电影| 国产精品jlzz视频| 久久精品亚洲综合一品| 国产麻豆精品入口在线观看| 亚洲午夜日韩高清一区| 久久精品国产亚洲77777| 兽交精品99高清毛片| 香港aa三级久久三级老师2021国产三级精品三级在 | 91精品视频在线| 久久亚洲日韩精品一区二区三区| 国产色婷婷五月精品综合在线| 日韩一二三区毛片| 精品日韩二区三区精品视频| 无码精品一区二区三区免费视频| 国产啪精品视频网站免费尤物| 国产乱码精品一区二区三| 西瓜精品国产自在现线| 国产精品日韩专区| 亚洲日韩精品无码AV海量| 日韩成人在线视屏| 人妖在线精品一区二区三区| 99re在线精品视频| 亚洲精品无码不卡| 久久精品成人无码观看56| 精品乱人伦一区二区三区| 日韩最新视频一区二区三| 国产精品久久久久三级| 天堂精品高清1区2区3区| 亚洲精品自偷自拍无码| 国产精品美女久久福利网站| 国产精品久久久久久影院| 91精品国产色综合久久不| 久久久无码精品亚洲日韩软件|